Theresa May will seek to quell growing support for a fresh referendum after a senior cabinet minister suggested MPs should be allowed a free vote on the next stage of Brexit.

The prime minister’s move, which will see her insist that a new vote would do “irreparable damage to the integrity of our politics”, also comes after members of her inner circle were forced to deny they were secretly working on plans to give the public a Final Say referendum.

Addressing the Commons on Monday when she updates MPs on her latest talks with EU leaders, Ms May will insist that another public vote should not be seen as a solution to the deadlock gripping the Commons. 

Join Indpendent Minds

For exclusive articles, events and an advertising-free read for just
a month

Get the best of The Independent

With an Independent Minds subscription for just
a month

Get the best of The Independent

Without the ads – for just
a month

“Let us not break faith with the British people by trying to stage another referendum,” she is expected to say.

“Another vote which would do irreparable damage to the integrity of our politics, because it would say to millions who trusted in democracy, that our democracy does not deliver.

“Another vote which would likely leave us no further forward than the last. And another vote which would further divide our country at the very moment we should be working to unite it.”

Her words will likely be seen as an attempt to end growing speculation about the prospect of another referendum.

With Labour still mulling whether to table a motion of no confidence in the prime minister this week, she will be desperate to avoid further alienating her Eurosceptic backbenchers.

Former Labour foreign secretary Dame Margaret Beckett, a supporter of the campaign for a People’s Vote, said of Ms May’s remarks: “It is highly significant that Downing Street felt it had to issue these advance extracts of her statement to the House of Commons on Sunday night, because officials know the prospect of a People’s Vote is being discussed not just in Westminster but in the corridors of Whitehall too.”

Today Liam Fox, the international trade secretary, appeared to back calls for MPs to vote on whether to hold a fresh referendum as he suggested parliament could be given a say on a range of Brexit outcomes.

The leading Brexiteer said he was not opposed to the idea of MPs being given a free vote on “what the options were” if, as expected, Ms May’s deal is rejected by MPs.

With the proposed withdrawal agreement “unlikely” to be approved by parliament, ministers needed to accept that there are only a “limited number of real-world options” available to them, he added.

Theresa May throws a ball for a border collie called Blitz as she and her husband Philip leave following a church service near her Maidenhead constituency (PA)

Five Remain-supporting cabinet ministers are reported to be urging Ms May to hold a series of “indicative votes” in the Commons on what the government’s next step should be, but Mr Fox is the first Leave-backing minister to endorse the calls. 

His intervention came as Ms May’s deputy and her chief of staff were forced to deny reports that they are secretly preparing for a Final Say referendum.

And as tensions spilled over and No 10 tried to distract attention from deepening Tory divisions, Ms May become embroiled in a bitter public spat with Tony Blair on the issue of another public vote.

The cabinet will meet on Tuesday with ministers expected to clash over how they should respond to widespread Commons opposition to the proposed withdrawal agreement.

Mr Fox said he would did not want a second referendum, which he claimed would “perpetuate the divisions in the country”.

Asked whether ministers could give Tory MPs a free vote on a series of potential Brexit outcomes, he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show: “That’s not something that we have considered [but] I have to say, personally I wouldn’t have a huge problem with parliament as a whole having a say on what the options were.

“It wasn’t the government that was given an instruction by the referendum, it was parliament.”

“Parliament said in that referendum, ‘We can’t make a decision – in this particular area we are going to subcontract our sovereignty to the people.’ And they gave us an instruction. It’s time parliament carried it out.”

And in a sign of growing support for MPs being given more say over Brexit, he suggested it would be parliament, not ministers, that “will have to decide on the alternatives” if Ms May is unable to secure the changes needed to get her deal through the Commons.

Damian Hinds, the education secretary, also said on Sunday that he was open to the idea of “flushing out” the different options, while Penny Mordaunt, the international development secretary, has for weeks been calling for Tory MPs to be given a free vote on the proposed Brexit deal.

It comes amid reports that David Lidington, Ms May’s deputy, met with Labour MPs last week to discuss a cross-party consensus for another referendum, while Gavin Barwell, her chief of staff, reportedly told ministers that a public vote is “the only way out of this”.

The pair took to Twitter to pour cold water on the claims.

Mr Barwell wrote: “Happy to confirm I am *not* planning a 2nd referendum with political opponents (or anyone else to anticipate the next question).”

Mr Lidington posted a link to a statement he made in the Commons last week in which he said another public vote “would certainly be divisive but could not guarantee to be decisive in ending this debate” and said its proponents “should not underestimate the damage that would be done to what is already fragile public confidence in our democratic institutions.”

He added: “As throughout my time in government I listen to views of MPs on all sides of the EU debate.”

Dividing lines were drawn and potential candidates to succeed Ms May jostled for position ahead of Tuesday’s key cabinet meeting. Foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt, who admitted he fancied “a crack” at being prime minister, said the UK could “flourish and prosper” if it leaves the EU without an agreement, while Ms Mordaunt put forward a plan for using technology to keep the Northern Ireland border open if there is a no-deal Brexit,

Theresa May insists Brexit deal is not dead despite EU leaders refusing to make concessions

Sajid Javid, the home secretary, and Andrea Leadsom, the leader of the Commons, are also likely to push for a managed no-deal exit if Ms May’s deal is rejected.

But Remain-supporting ministers including Mr Lidington, Philip Hammond, the chancellor, and Amber Rudd, the work and pensions secretary, are understood to be pushing Ms May to hold a series of “indicative votes”, including the option of a second referendum. It is believed they are backed by David Gauke, the justice secretary, and Greg Clark, the business secretary.

On Saturday, Ms Rudd called on Ms May to “try something different” and attempt to build cross-party support for an alternative Brexit plan.

As the campaign for a Final Say vote gathered pace, Tony Blair hit back at Ms May after she launched a blistering attack on him.

The war of words escalated when the former prime minister called Ms May “irresponsible” and claimed she was trying to “steamroller” her deal through parliament.

Hours earlier, she had accused the former Labour leader of “undermining” her during negotiations with the EU, and she said his lobbying for another referendum was “an insult to the office he once held and the people he once served”.

In response, Mr Blair said it was clear that “neither the British people nor their parliament will unite behind the prime minister’s deal”.

He said: “In these circumstances it is not irresponsible or insulting to put forward an alternative way to achieve resolution. The sensible thing is now to allow parliament to vote on each of the forms of Brexit canvassed including the prime minister’s deal.

“If they can’t reach agreement then the logical thing is to go back to the people. To describe such a course as an insult is a strange description of what would be the opportunity for them to instruct parliament as to how to proceed. Far from being anti-democratic it would be the opposite, as indeed many senior figures in her party from past and present have been saying.”

Criticising Ms May’s approach, he added: “What is irresponsible however is to try to steamroller MPs into accepting a deal they genuinely think is a bad one with the threat that if they do not fall into line, the government will have the country crash out without a deal.” 

The Independent has launched its #FinalSay campaign to demand that voters are given a voice on the final Brexit deal.

Sign our petition here

Read More


  1. Hey, how’s it going?

    I want to pass along some very important news that everyone needs to hear!

    In December of 2017, Donald Trump made history by recognizing Jerusalem as the captial of Israel. Why is this big news? Because by this the Jewish people of Israel are now able to press forward in bringing about the Third Temple prophesied in the Bible.

    The Jewish people deny Jesus as their Messiah and have stated that their Messiah has been identified and is waiting to be revealed. They say this man will rule the world under a one world religion called “spiritualism”.

    They even printed a coin to raise money for the Temple with Donald Trumps face on the front and with king Cyrus'(who built the second Temple) behind him. On the back of the coin is an image of the third Temple.

    The Bible says this false Messiah who seats himself in the Third Temple will be thee antichrist that will bring about the Great Tribulation, though the Jewish people believe he will bring about world peace. It will be a false peace for a period of time. You can watch interviews of Jewish Rabbi’s in Israel speaking of these things. They have their plans set in place. It is only years away!

    More importantly, the power that runs the world wants to put a RFID microchip in our body making us total slaves to them. This chip matches perfectly with the Mark of the Beast in the Bible, more specifically Revelation 13:16-18:

    He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.

    Referring to the last days, this could only be speaking of a cashless society, which we have yet to see, but are heading towards. Otherwise, we could still buy or sell without the mark amongst others if physical money was still currency. RFID microchip implant technology will be the future of a one world cashless society containing digital currency. It will be implanted in the right-hand or the forehead, and we cannot buy or sell without it! We must grow strong in Jesus. AT ALL COSTS, DO NOT TAKE IT!

    Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.” (Revelation 14:9-11).

    People have been saying the end is coming for many years, but we need two key things. One, the Third Temple, and two, the technology for a cashless society to fulfill the prophecy of the Mark of the Beast.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here